P.S./I.S. 119 The Glendale

74-01 78 AVENUE, QUEENS, NY 11385 · Queens · K-8

DBN: 24Q119

K-8

Zoned: Elementary

Zoned: Middle

SchoolDigger Elementary: 277 (of 2445)

SchoolDigger Middle: 356 (of 1500)

Niche Elementary: 482 (of 2817)

Niche Middle: 221 (of 1516)

Zones into these middle schools

P.S./I.S. 119 The Glendale P.S./I.S. 087 Middle Village

Fed by these elementary schools

P.S./I.S. 119 The Glendale P.S./I.S. 087 Middle Village P.S. 128 The Lorraine Tuzzo, Juniper Valley Elementary School P.S./I.S. 113 Anthony J. Pranzo P.S. 088 Seneca P.S. 071 Forest P.S. 068 Cambridge P.S. 091 Richard Arkwright

Academic quality

ELA = English Language Arts (reading and writing). Math and Science are self-explanatory.
NY State tests ELA and Math every year in grades 3-8, and Science once, in grade 8 -- a school's numbers below only reflect whichever of those grades it actually serves (no social studies/history state test exists at this level).
"Avg. rating" is DOE's average student score on a 1.0-4.5 scale (higher is better) -- shown here as "value / 4.5" alongside the citywide average for the same metric as a benchmark for what's typical.

Attendance: 93.3%

79% attend 90%+ of days

Subject

Student group

Overall proficiency

ELA % proficient

70.8%(citywide avg: 74.3%)

ELA avg. rating

3.42 / 4.5(citywide avg: 3.46 / 4.5)

Math % proficient

73.9%(citywide avg: 72.5%)

Math avg. rating

3.51 / 4.5(citywide avg: 3.45 / 4.5)

Science % proficient (Grade 8 only)

28.3%

Science avg. rating (Grade 8 only)

2.63 / 4.5

By grade

Grade 3 ELA

81.5%

Grade 3 Math

88.8%

Grade 4 ELA

82.4%

Grade 4 Math

80%

Grade 5 ELA

81.1%

Grade 5 Math

85.4%

Grade 6 ELA

66.7%

Grade 6 Math

65%

Grade 7 ELA

59.4%

Grade 7 Math

72.7%

Grade 8 ELA

71.8%

Grade 8 Math

70%

By student group

English Language Learners -- ELA

33.9%(citywide avg: 38.2%)

English Language Learners -- Math

44.5%(citywide avg: 43.8%)

Students with disabilities -- ELA

19.4%

Students with disabilities -- Math

31%

Asian students -- ELA

91.8%(citywide avg: 90.9%)

Asian students -- Math

97.7%(citywide avg: 91.6%)

Black students -- ELA

57.9%(citywide avg: 64.7%)

Small sample (19 students) -- treat as directional.

Black students -- Math

68.8%(citywide avg: 67.3%)

Small sample (16 students) -- treat as directional.

Hispanic/Latino students -- ELA

50.4%(citywide avg: 55.8%)

Hispanic/Latino students -- Math

46.6%(citywide avg: 49.4%)

White students -- ELA

73.4%(citywide avg: 77.1%)

White students -- Math

79.2%(citywide avg: 76.9%)

Multiracial students -- ELA

66.7%(citywide avg: 71%)

Multiracial students -- Math

80%(citywide avg: 80.1%)

"% proficient" is the share of students scoring Level 3 or 4 on the state test. Citywide comparisons are the average across schools of the same type. Grades and groups with very few tested students are flagged since a handful of kids can swing the percentage a lot; groups too small to report are omitted by DOE for student privacy -- that's also why Science, tested only once, shows up far less often than ELA/Math.Source: NYC Open Data: School Quality Reports Data (2023-24 school year)

See full grade-by-grade test results (ELA, Math, Science) →

Demographics

1214 students enrolled

Economic Need Index: 48.9%

Race & ethnicity

Asian

32%

Black

1.3%

Hispanic or Latino

29.1%

White

35.4%

Multiracial

1.6%

Native American

0.7%

Other groups

Students with disabilities

10.6%

English Language Learners

7.4%

Living in poverty

73%

Female

49.8%

Male

50.2%

Economic Need Index is DOE's estimate of the share of students facing economic hardship, based on eligibility for public assistance, temporary housing status, and household income relative to the poverty line. Some very high values are reported by DOE only as "Above 95%" for student privacy and are shown here as 95%.Source: NYC Open Data: Demographic Snapshot (2021-22 school year)

Kindergarten admissions priority breakdown

Admissions cycle

Zoned

25 seats

Priority groups, in the order NYC DOE offers seats. Tap a group for NYC DOE's exact wording.

1. Students who live in the zone and have a sibling at the school.

~100% admitted

There were fewer than 5 applicants in this group and all received offers last year.This group's offers alone accounted for ~16% of the program's seats -- not the same as this group's own admit rate above, since offers can exceed seats (not everyone who gets one enrolls).

2. Other students who live in the zone.

~100% admitted

There were about 10 applicants in this group and all received offers last year.This group's offers alone accounted for ~40% of the program's seats -- not the same as this group's own admit rate above, since offers can exceed seats (not everyone who gets one enrolls).

3. Students who live in the district and who are eligible for Free or Reduced Price lunch and have a sibling at the school.

~100% admitted

4. Other students who live in the district and have a sibling at the school.

~100% admitted

5. Students who live outside the district and who are eligible for Free or Reduced Price lunch and have a sibling at the school.

No applicants

There were no applicants in this group.This group's offers alone accounted for ~0% of the program's seats -- not the same as this group's own admit rate above, since offers can exceed seats (not everyone who gets one enrolls).

6. Other students who live outside the district and have a sibling at the school.

No applicants

7. Students who live in the district and who are eligible for Free or Reduced Price lunch.

~100% admitted

There were about 5 applicants in this group and all received offers last year.This group's offers alone accounted for ~20% of the program's seats -- not the same as this group's own admit rate above, since offers can exceed seats (not everyone who gets one enrolls).

8. Other students who live in the district.

~100% admitted

9. Students who are eligible for Free or Reduced Price lunch.

~100% admitted

10. Other students who live outside the district.

~0% admitted

There were fewer than 5 applicants in this group and none received offers last year.This group's offers alone accounted for ~0% of the program's seats -- not the same as this group's own admit rate above, since offers can exceed seats (not everyone who gets one enrolls).

Estimates derived from NYC DOE's own wording, which rounds and fuzzes small numbers for privacy. Each group's applicant count is independent of the others -- schools are usually oversubscribed, so applicant counts across groups often add up to more than the total seats. That's expected, not an error.Source: NYC DOE MySchools Admissions Data (2025-26 admissions cycle)

Middle School admissions priority breakdown

Admissions cycle

Screened

76 seats

2 applicants per seat

Priority groups, in the order NYC DOE offers seats. Tap a group for NYC DOE's exact wording.

1. Priority to students attending the PS 119 Gifted & Talented Program

~100% admitted

There were about 50 applicants in this group and all received offers last year.This group's offers alone accounted for ~66% of the program's seats -- not the same as this group's own admit rate above, since offers can exceed seats (not everyone who gets one enrolls).

2. Then to students and residents of District 24

~43% admitted

There were about 70 applicants in this group and about 30 received offers last year.This group's offers alone accounted for ~39% of the program's seats -- not the same as this group's own admit rate above, since offers can exceed seats (not everyone who gets one enrolls).

3. Then to New York City residents

~0% admitted

There were about 30 applicants in this group and none received offers last year.This group's offers alone accounted for ~0% of the program's seats -- not the same as this group's own admit rate above, since offers can exceed seats (not everyone who gets one enrolls).